From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Wikstr=F6m=2C_Gustav=22?= Subject: Org-toggle-checkbox broken in 7.5? Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:53:07 +0200 Message-ID: <3DC4AE9DA481CC4DAED5422B18C4CE45027B06C9@sogorex01.ad.sogeti.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC2775.BA747D2F" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV2Au-0000d9-4M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:55:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV2As-0004fP-Rq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:54:59 -0400 Received: from gse-mta-09-tx.mimesweeper.biz ([194.116.198.145]:36599 helo=gse-mta-09.mimesweeper.biz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QV2As-0004fF-Bl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:54:58 -0400 Received: from 193.45.43.37 ([193.45.43.37]) by gse-mta-09.mimesweeper.biz with emfmta (version 4.8.2.32) vanilla id 3124681028 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; d4afc5b47f67fcf7; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:53:08 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2775.BA747D2F Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! =20 The command C-c C-x C-b has stopped working for me and I quietly blame = 7.5 for it. Anyone who can attest or reject this statement? =20 Best regards Gustav ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2775.BA747D2F Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello!

The command C-c C-x C-b has stopped working for me and I = quietly blame 7.5 for it. Anyone who can attest or reject this = statement?

Best regards

Gustav

------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2775.BA747D2F--