From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Export as HTML Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:06:16 +0200 Message-ID: <3D93E2D5-BEFB-4D19-8DB9-84363C3412AF@gmail.com> References: <87hc1bwfsq.fsf@mundaneum.com> <874oxbwedd.fsf@mundaneum.com> <871vsfgpom.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <873acvhxwe.fsf@fastmail.fm> <1E2E8AB7-274B-4283-AC02-631D165C06E1@gmail.com> <87bpridbuj.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOgd-0001Cc-3Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:06:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOgY-0001Ac-40 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:06:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57277 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoOgX-0001AW-Sh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:06:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:60994) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoOgX-0006op-5y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:06:21 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2373818ewy.42 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bpridbuj.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Vauban?= , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:55 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> Still, if it is "common practice" to call this outermost >> container "container" instead of "content", I would not >> object to rename it. > > "content" (see some drupal templates and Org-mode) or "wrapper" (see > OP) > or "wrap" (see some CMSs, e.g. typolight) or ... > > ??? I think, we will just leave things the way they are. Issue closed - as far as I am concerned. - Carsten