From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Timeline not working in 5.20 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:12:53 +0100 Message-ID: <3D8D588E-0E2D-4C86-B910-8A8CF0135E1D@science.uva.nl> References: <87ir12e76r.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu> <81156AB7-161F-4CBB-A936-54DA8F56D9A2@science.uva.nl> <47AA0308.1030109@gmail.com> <87abmdwuj9.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JN2Cv-0005R5-Sg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:34:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JN2Cs-0005Q2-41 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:34:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JN2Cr-0005Pl-HI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:34:05 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JN2Cr-0000qT-4Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:34:05 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so652762ugf.48 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:34:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark Ochocki Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Feb 7, 2008, at 3:11 AM, Mark Ochocki wrote: > Phil Jackson wrote: >> Wanrong Lin writes: >>> I have the same problem, and here is a mini-example that will >>> generate >>> the error "Arithmetic range error: "floor", -0.0e+NaN ", hope it >>> helps. >> I've had a look and I think the culprit is: >> ,----[ line 21411 ] >> | dfrac (/ (* 1.0 (- wdays diff)) wdays) >> `---- >> Which evals to -0.0e+NaN and then propagates. Might see if I can dig >> further tomorrow if I get time. >> Cheers, >> Phil > > I believe line 21411 also causes problems with Deadlines when > individual items are changed from the default set in org-deadline- > warning-days. > > Here's an example from my org file: > > Day-agenda: > Controller: In 4 d.: TODO Review Fin... :workpc:(priority 1060) > Controller: In 5 d.: TODO Brief MA... :work: (priority 1050) > Controller: In 4 d.: TODO Run sale... :workpc:(priority 1042) > > org file: > ***** TODO Run sale... :workpc: > DEADLINE: <2008-02-10 Sun +1m -7d> > ***** TODO Review Fin... :workpc: > DEADLINE: <2008-02-10 Sun +1m -10d> > ***** TODO Brief MA... :work: > DEADLINE: <2008-02-11 Mon -10d> Well, I guess this is a matter of taste. Do you want the deadlines prioritized according to the fraction of warning time that has past, or according to the number of days left to do them. Opinions? - Carsten > > > > I think the 5 day deadline should have a lower priority than the 4 > day priority regardless of the percentage of completion. Agree? > > Mark J. Ochocki > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode