From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: <39D89F57-DEE2-4539-90C0-07F212DF41BD@gmail.com> References: <8696.1358358500@alphaville> <16014.1358398925@alphaville> <717C030F-136F-46CA-B0C0-5F9CB3560921@gmail.com> <17512.1358412853@alphaville> <3FCB9B91-63EA-4443-A56C-F6BB80AED2D6@gmail.com> <20573.1358437637@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvxDc-0006jM-RO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:41:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvxDb-0002BB-Ha for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:41:52 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]:62604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvxDb-0002Aw-9w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:41:51 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so318369wey.14 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:41:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20573.1358437637@alphaville> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Rainer Stengele , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 17.1.2013, at 16:47, Nick Dokos wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> ... >>> I tried with my agenda which calls org-agenda-skip 5768 times. Without >>> the mod, they took 0.13s; with the mod, they took 0.19s, so that's a 50% >>> increase - but the overall time was actually shorter in the second case: >>> 1.64s vs 1.72s. >> > >> Did you have a number of commented SCHEDULED items in there, so that >> time was saved on those items? Otherwise it would be hard to see why >> things should actually go faster. > > No, I just ran it on my standard items which do not include any > commmented SCHEDULED items. It may have been just scheduling delays > because of all the *other* things running on my laptop, or there may > have been caching effects - or I may have screwed up. As I said, I would > have to do many more (and more careful) experiments before I'd trust > these numbers. OK, NIck, thanks for your reply. - Carsten > > Nick >