From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: bulk rescheduling change? Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:39:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3948.1347503982@alphaville> References: <87mx0vi81a.fsf@altern.org> <8103.1347464053@alphaville> <8419.1347464859@alphaville> <87ligfxlk1.fsf@altern.org> <9459.1347467106@alphaville> <87627jxkvs.fsf@altern.org> <2861.1347471570@alphaville> <3596.1347473565@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <3920.1347474577@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <5589.1347480129@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <5838.1347481364@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <87oblaq0ly.fsf@altern.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBzLJ-0005M8-Er for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:39:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBzLH-00022R-DI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:39:49 -0400 Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:33144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBzLH-000226-71 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:39:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien of "Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:31:53 +0200." <87oblaq0ly.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Greg Troxel Bastien wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > > > Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four > > items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking > > them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next day, which > > apparently is taken as an indication that I want things to be > > rescheduled for that date, no questions asked. Not sure I like this > > much. > > This implementation was to mimick the previous behavior we had with > `k m' (to mark an entry) then `k s' (to schedule it to the date at > point with no prompt.) > > I don't like having no prompt here too. > > I just changed the behavior so that there is *always* a prompt > with `m m m B s' -- if the cursor is on a date, this date is the > default time for the prompt, RET will reschedule to this date. > Thanks - this sounds much better. I hope Greg likes it too. I ran a bunch of things past it and it worked perfectly (imo of course). > > However, if I move the cursor off the date line before I issue the > > bulk command, I get a date dialog, but it's a no-op: no matter what > > I give it, things are rescheduled to today. > I also turned the time grid back on in the agenda and that's working without errors too. Thanks! Nick