From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:42:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3709.1319557336@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <80obx6vniu.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87vcrdyfhy.fsf@gmail.com> <201110250914.29233.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
	<80zkgptrm0.fsf@somewhere.org> <87ipnd3zbr.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33476)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1RIj98-0002ER-RY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:42:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1RIj93-000420-Ie
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:42:34 -0400
Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.45]:3564)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1RIj93-000415-Ez
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:42:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
	of "Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:44:56 MDT." <87ipnd3zbr.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:

> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't
> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been
> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks
> as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name: here making it a tie,
> and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon myself giving #+name: the
> win.
> 

This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that easily.
I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT, the BDFL, the
NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to the democratic rules
some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death! Who's with me?




Nobody?




Dang - I'll go back to sleep then.