From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: org-mode wrongly parse asterisk (*) in a math equation as mark of bold font Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <34BBBA25-9FF3-4C53-AF7E-55F0F46DE780@gmail.com> References: <338223C2-DC99-4F0D-A8C1-DD62EAA87027@gmail.com> <808vfa8j7v.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjT20-0007wh-Hq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:30:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjT1v-0007jG-K8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:30:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:63937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SjT1v-0007iq-BX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:29:55 -0400 Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so804185wib.0 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:29:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <808vfa8j7v.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 26.6.2012, at 12:23, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hi Carsten, >=20 > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On 26.6.2012, at 10:45, Zihan, Sheldon Liu wrote: >>=20 >>> I wrote the following line in org-mode, which contains two = equations. >>>=20 >>> $(Z^{*}_{m}, \cdot m)$ $(Z^{*}_{m}, \cdot m)$ >>>=20 >>> But the org-mode didn't identify them as equations. Instead, it = highlight >>> the part between the two *s, i.e. }_{m}, \cdot m)$ $(Z^{, making = this part >>> bold. Is this a bug of org-mode or my own mistake? >>=20 >> Is this with the new exporter? I tried the old one just now, and it = did this >> correctly in both cases=85. >=20 > AFAIU, the OP is not talking of export, only of how it's visible in = the Org > buffer itself. >=20 > It's true that the equation is not shown as it should (in this case) = because > `*' are interpreted as bold markers. Ah, OK. Sorry for the Noise. Difficult to fix, this would require a = better parser. One work-around would be to use \ast for the star.. - Carsten