From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Add anniversary and org-mode Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:52:28 +0100 Message-ID: <3445BE1E-ED7D-4EC2-BB40-99BAD4043A02@science.uva.nl> References: <87od99n1qm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87prtplm64.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <9uwsnxlli0.fsf@richardriley.net> <87d4ppll92.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hcf1p83y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87abkstd5v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <0039AE2B-38CD-43E0-9888-CA0F13E11E4F@science.uva.nl> <6458.1206256617@norvel.baumann-gauting.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JdPgf-0004np-HK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:52:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JdPge-0004nd-LT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:52:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JdPge-0004na-Ik for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:52:32 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdPge-0001C1-6I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:52:32 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so2286953fga.30 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:52:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6458.1206256617@norvel.baumann-gauting.site> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: dtbaumann@yahoo.de Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mar 23, 2008, at 8:16 AM, Thomas Baumann wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> Should we put this into CONTRIB? >> >> - Carsten > > > There are most likely some changes within the next few days. > > Should the code, which is for those who don't make use > of the integration of anniversaries in the diary, rely on bbdb- > anniv.el > (which is itself a contrib to bbdb)? > > Or should it better be a stand-alone interface? Hi Thomas, I think a stand-alone solution would be useful. Once your paperwork has come through, maybe we should merge the code into org-bbdb.el? I did not name these files org-link-bbdb.el exactly so that we can add other bbdb related code. - Carsten