From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: two questions about the new exporter (#+Style: and org-export-html-postamble) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:41:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3191.1361292096@alphaville> References: <87ppzwb7qm.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7r90-00040p-Ky for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:38:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7r8s-0006rZ-Uv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:38:15 -0500 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:20701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7r8s-0006pS-PL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:38:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Schulte of "Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:14:57 MST." <87ppzwb7qm.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Org Mode Mailing List Eric Schulte wrote: > Hi, > > First let me say kudos to Nicolas for the implementation and to him and > Bastien for making the transition, it seems rather like changing the > engine on a plane in mid flight (all while handling a rowdy group of > passengers). > > For the first time I'm really using this new exporter, and I have > noticed two thing which surprise me and seem at first glance to be > behaving incorrectly (although it is likely my expectations which are > incorrect). > > 1. The value of org-export-html-postamble doesn't appear to be honored. > I often set this variable in a file local line at the top of a file, > and despite setting it to nil I still see a postamble in my exported > html. > Rainer had the same question. I believe such variables are considered backend-specific and so the names have been changed: they've lost the "export-" part. In general, you might want to try changing the name and trying again. Presumably that will be clarified when the documentation is available, but for now I hope it's a reasonable guideline (but subject to corrections). Nick