From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Continuation of main section text after subsections Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: <31082.1301323376@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51517 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4Df4-0003jU-H2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:43:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Dew-0008N9-UB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:43:11 -0400 Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.13]:60938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Dew-0008Mv-Qs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:43:10 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LIR00B97VJKVSF0@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:42:57 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Samuel Wales of "Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:07:04 PDT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: Memnon Anon , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales wrote: > Perhaps we could have a tag like :noexport: except that it exports > body. It does not export the header. Optionally, it would be > replaced with a blank line. > > Then he can put headers anywhere he wants. > > Would this work for the OP's use case? > My reading of it was that he wanted that to be done as he is putting down his thoughts into the pensieve - ...err... org file I mean - so doing it in export is too late. But I'm not the OP so maybe I've read it wrong. Using an imaginary EBNF spec, here's what org (and LaTeX) provides: ::= [] ()* i.e. "a tree is some optional text followed by 0 or more trees", whereas I think he wants: ::= [] ( [text])* I hope these are not grossly wrong, but please take them with the appropriate grain of salt. Nick