From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Need Help: [patch] A experimental toy which is used to preview
 latex fragements
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:45:19 -0400
Message-ID: <30896.1332611119@alphaville>
References: <874ntfyber.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkb6xgv8.fsf@gmail.com>
	<30714.1332610374@alphaville>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42152)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SBV1p-000561-RC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:45:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SBV1o-000759-75
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:45:25 -0400
Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:37146)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SBV1o-000755-1y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:45:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
	of "Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:32:54 EDT." <30714.1332610374@alphaville>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: FengShu <tumashu@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:

> FengShu <tumashu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > ...
> >   At this time ,it can't covert all the latex fragments in the
> > buffer and only convert one, I can't find the problem due my
> > pool computer language ability. so I need help!
> > 
> 
> I tried your patch and I can see the problem (I think), but it might not
> be a problem with your patch: I run into it even if
> org-create-formula-image-program is set to dvipng. Of course, there is a
> possibility that your patch broke dvipng, but at this point it doesn't
> look that way.
> 
> I'll do some more testing and let you know.
> 

No, you are right: it does seem as if your patch causes only the first
fragment to be processed (in both the dvipng and imagemagick cases).
Unpatched org (with dvipng) processes everything.

Nick