From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property
 lines
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:06:36 -0400
Message-ID: <30891.1319141196@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43562)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1RGyt1-00053R-Qu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:06:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1RGyt0-00035l-7A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:06:43 -0400
Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:41483)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1RGyt0-00033q-1I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:06:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
	of "Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:43:35 MDT." <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have just pushed up a change to the Org-mode git repository which
> removes support for #+BABEL lines.  Please use the more general
> #+PROPERTIES lines instead.
> 

Coming late to the dance - sorry. I think that's very confusing.
"Property" is an overloaded term in org: we now have the :PROPERTIES:
drawer, the #+PROPERTY line and the #+PROPERTIES line (singular and
plural forms are already pretty bad).  Also, there is the general
concept of properties (the stuff that the property API applies to).

Unless there is an underlying unity of which I'm unaware, I'd strongly
suggest another term - perhaps CODE_BLOCK_HEADER_ARGUMENTS (plus
an easy-template for easy insertion). 

Nick