From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id OMZtG4a0rGVtrAAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:07:02 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id OMZtG4a0rGVtrAAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:07:02 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=NACpSztt; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705817222; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=BcmVJDZQBF9pgD7P9Z5eNYdoq6lQGgvzvE5+dxHur4o=; b=lstnLBZA7NOhD2q1oRWYLI44wPTeD0ZqYc2cLd2eD1U4hSwAPr2Tm0yPci5p3jL+mMH9wV CIpa6MQnh+NEiIuIIjHB5LqwzPCRBAW8FyBpZx068DjIfRSwVPbPEe/NcOpw+R2jS4wcsK n1CDx98DPpwJ4ktqJjPW03Hcto0JyLKFqE8R0JTvpyDrHmbsuVaOZTNjSHCnnMz1OxLySK e+PioBW2NKf50MDu8uuhEKTkMokZAwRRm3+Pcz2/xoPxm6It3HsWan0RSc3arFq6JGNvi6 /l/AQlwGAZb88eC6HO4lJXDdAOFmanEmdovQosTREraPDqgHp++Gs1Q/XbVdbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=NACpSztt; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705817222; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bzoHEq6LcwDXTo1DC4YJY3wFoypTwtLaiUp9269Jrhqei/RbVdJQObu9Fa6rv23XxyB23g e0S69uCdhnbhBA0r7sg3r6Uw+660YFvJxjbR1V3qP43sA1BBBwwAJSybSJn86YIKiozL/P SU12+7SCJKK1RAa0cVR7ThwIb2FxodURvnI5DtJxEt0egZ8mWPwBXOnd/11er2Z2eJeCSu Nv9Z7mhdTyKtNz5UCmPBGynAaMFUE8CAfph11LooW33K0fmPBXQQbQN/UxXQHn5q11c1pM G916Qk+7hVXKW0kQn4T7vW+juBjOgJ6G7XfCu1Kd6doj1K6rjgejda7144b12A== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F11118CD for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:07:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRQyC-000535-Ps; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 01:06:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRQy7-00050s-NP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 01:06:09 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRQy5-0004Gx-9p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 01:06:07 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50eac018059so2782129e87.0 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 22:06:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705817163; x=1706421963; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mail-followup-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BcmVJDZQBF9pgD7P9Z5eNYdoq6lQGgvzvE5+dxHur4o=; b=NACpSzttjtimfQ94JOI4GZCiastyxqKO7Uvphn7E+6EksFfdXioTIGn35+X9qIMsS2 31sRJveWhWKsJmIfxh7V3mODNBcr6kgx5JYIabrPeRyk7x8z9ZU45BXvB1o0Lqe5ZmoG psMypvaZ4eQCzW3smWO1kz4qv4DJne9zy+Ggy54Rb3nEX4z00tdXSZtHcSNaOK0f07BY VUCAguKDq5NIRFJDBAc26qDfdoe49FJwdqXX545tTQIwMvZi1fctck4PtwS5ZAQQobm/ N4HZ501cxJ3VvZ9imYjHEtb5kQaKALgokiTRxqGgmBcZYO+WNUjJ1v4uL0J+TH2wF+NB v6eA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705817163; x=1706421963; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mail-followup-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=BcmVJDZQBF9pgD7P9Z5eNYdoq6lQGgvzvE5+dxHur4o=; b=Pmj7RkwPeMsHGx2xMTFuEhMPZ0npVldUJaAmnVgqjIfHhPTAB5OuaV4DIVAZajlFK2 WFaTKu62kHLyjlZyUJ7ApbGKxTx4iOBNSQfcCyKv+sp3PWUKGB6yTxIHxoB18qOKV/77 e1DL5UFiO0gDcPW2ANvlavETf9lxadyWWDYA4odcFwabiRLBrCMkcXZcSwPTZq8xHBR3 nAREpjkSXNYM/hMaTY3bI0MkhyBMDmLcXt8SYVnXj4gCpXjjXAQhl24ARIRz75ESNYaW r06+rPuPylPQQukNJBbjQNba4L08RBe3oYnO8+Q9mYr0IYA6hEnwcuj3LEMAai4d6QAG o9bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzeThYC/Y2tH6BqApSxwmK0GaGcQUg3PsWOHnG3RRT3bVZtW/LP RhDjh6/iE0EeLKOo5rHqBirJPpHft83nQ9HzqFqUy9R7TKC60f2f X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFKXyCsYacr7q5Pl6QTnHKtwjlFF2dD76ThFPc6PaOdBPgzBfUYsidrU+JA35fNTWbUxK4KNg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:558:b0:50e:44a5:57b0 with SMTP id h24-20020a056512055800b0050e44a557b0mr866759lfl.121.1705817163190; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 22:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (nat-0-0.nsk.sibset.net. [5.44.169.188]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id cf3-20020a056512280300b0050e751923b1sm1530876lfb.108.2024.01.20.22.06.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Jan 2024 22:06:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2c2c9da3-9200-44b8-8cd6-8e832c6731af@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:06:01 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [possible patch] Remove the '\\[0pt]' string from the last line of a verse block in LaTeX export Content-Language: en-US, ru-RU To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= Cc: orgmode References: <874jfvjo2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu5uv7c.fsf@localhost> <878r4tfccn.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfx9t7di.fsf@localhost> <87wmsddlw5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ikrt5h.fsf@localhost> <87o7dnefwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu1l69f.fsf@localhost> <87il3tax9a.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uwjerg.fsf@localhost> <87o7dju9vn.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uuaj11.fsf@localhost> <87h6j96xn5.fsf@posteo.net> <871qac6v5j.fsf@localhost> <87o7dgf8bb.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7dg5d8f.fsf@localhost> <87frysf1wf.fsf@posteo.net> <875xzn6dw3.fsf@localhost> From: Max Nikulin Mail-Followup-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= , orgmode In-Reply-To: <875xzn6dw3.fsf@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12b; envelope-from=manikulin@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.14 X-Spam-Score: 5.14 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 21F11118CD X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: 550BZA6xs+0a On 21/01/2024 01:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Juan Manuel Macías writes: >> >> lorem\\ @@latex:[ipsum]@@ ==> the problem is in the user's territory I agree with Juan Manuel. > I see your point. > Although I am still a bit hesitant to remove > `org-latex-line-break-safe'. > What would be the benefit of removing it? For now, I mostly just see > that it will make the life harder for users in Scenario B. An option might be disabling it by default without removing the code completely. Depending on user feedback it may be removed later. Users, who need to submit LaTeX code, consider [0pt] as undesired noise. I see their point of view.