From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:56:30 -0500
Message-ID: <28732.1292601390@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com>  <91598.1292588125@iu.edu>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41501 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTcgG-00064z-Lk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:57:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1PTcfk-00046u-QN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:56:45 -0500
Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:45274)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1PTcfk-00046g-Jo
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:56:44 -0500
Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106])
	by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net
	(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16
	2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LDK00CJEXM6EK90@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for
	emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:56:31 -0600 (CST)
In-reply-to: Message from "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> of
	"Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:15:25 EST." <91598.1292588125@iu.edu>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Org-mode ml <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Andrew J. Korty <ajk@iu.edu> wrote:

> Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is
> definitely superfluous.  Who has a mail client that can't filter on
> the List-Id field?
> 

It may be superfluous for some (all?) mail clients, but it is not
supefluous for *me*. Some duplication/supefluity is a *necessary* part
of effective human communication. Of course, you can argue that *this*
supefluity is *really* supefluous, but I'd disagree :-)

Nick