From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:41:12 -0400
Message-ID: <28175.1338565272@alphaville>
References: <7321.1338312260@alphaville> <87y5o7dtlr.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33887)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SaTye-0001GS-Tn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:41:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SaTyd-0002D8-7B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:41:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
	of "Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:55:44 +0200." <87y5o7dtlr.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Nick,
> 
> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
> 
> > There was a recent commit 8c91f690a561113eee0d16cdb6e8afc6bcae2089 to
> > follow a time stamp as a link. I have no problem with that but the code
> > uses the org-at-timestamp-p function, which (perversely IMO) thinks that
> > I am in a timestamp even when I'm right *after* the closing bracket; so
> > pressing RET after inserting a time stamp follows the link, instead of
> > inserting a newline. Since I do that fairly often, I find the behavior
> > annoying.
> 
> I agree this can be annoying.  The behavior is now to insert a new line
> when the point is right after the timestamp.
> 

Thanks! The annoyance is gone.

Nick