From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: A bit of work around org-clock-idle-time
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:19:59 -0400
Message-ID: <28102.1343445599@alphaville>
References: <CAHbMD+EqDFc3qRn=VYqL4+_TYTsNp+Ttx=McV-HXtu2__qD8VQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<8935.1342651403@alphaville> <87r4rwsrbz.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32774)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SuxZY-0004TR-QD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:20:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1SuxZX-0008VH-S8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:20:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
	of "Sat, 28 Jul 2012 01:43:28 +0200." <87r4rwsrbz.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Nicolas Calderon <nicolas.calderon.asselin@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
> 
> > o in org-clock.el, instead of checking whether x11idle exists or not, how
> >   about something like this:
> >
> >   ...
> >   (eq window-system 'x)
> >      (max (org-x11-idle-seconds) (org-emacs-idle-seconds))
> >   ...
> 
> Yes, this is cleaner, thanks!
> 

Cleaner maybe, but it's not correct, as Nicolas C. pointed out. Nicolas
C. and I had an email exchange and I hope he will follow up with revised
patches.

Nick