From: pete phillips <pete@smtl.co.uk>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: depending TODOs, scheduling following TODOs automatically
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:10:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27900.1192122650@lap1.smtl.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071011163712.GC6275@odin.demosthenes.org>
>>>>> "Russell" == Russell Adams <RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.Com> writes:
Russell> however you must realize that a tool meant to maintain
Russell> personal lists of items may eventually grow to encompass
Russell> larger projects.
:-)
I do realise this. But the question that needs to be answered
is whether this is necessarily the best path ?
Russell> I think the reason this discussion took off is that if an
Russell> existing project management tool worked the way we wanted
Russell> it to, this would be a moot discussion. As it is, it
Russell> appears that none of the traditional PM style tools
Russell> integrate with Org use or provide similar functionality. I
Russell> know I've been frustrated trying to export Org data to MS
Russell> Project and keep them in sync.
It could be that you are trying to use the wrong tool ? Task Juggler
http://www.taskjuggler.org/
is cross platform and will do all the PM you need out of the box. As
the system is based on a text mode, I am willing to bet that you could
write some perl or other code to move your org file into it. Possibly
the other way as well.
Don't get me wrong - I have used PM tools myself for very big projects
(in fact I used to maintain the PM FAQ document on Usenet many years ago
http://www.non.com/news.answers/proj-plan-faq.html), but I just question
if org-mode is the right path to follow for this.
Let me explain my concern. If Carsten decides to move along the PM route
(and it is entirely his call), then I suspect that the amount of code
required to implement all the necessary functionality will be huge. It
would probably dwarf the present org-mode code base.
At that stage, the ability of Carsten to respond so quickly to requests
for features and bug fixes will, I think, be compromised. Also, it is
bound to have an effect on the speed of org mode. My main concern is
that the focus of org-mode will have shifted away from where I want it
to be, which I admit is a personal concern and perhaps a little selfish
:-)
Anyway, just my thoughts.
Have a good evening all.
Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 6:56 depending TODOs, scheduling following TODOs automatically Rainer Stengele
2007-10-08 13:26 ` Denis Bueno
2007-10-08 13:43 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-08 13:52 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-08 19:48 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-08 20:12 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-09 10:13 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-08 14:49 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-08 20:55 ` Bastien
2007-10-08 20:26 ` Adam Spiers
2007-10-09 2:15 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 3:03 ` John Wiegley
2007-10-09 3:47 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-09 9:27 ` Richard G Riley
2007-10-09 14:39 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-10 17:20 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 10:35 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 10:32 ` Bastien
2007-10-11 14:46 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-11 15:53 ` pete phillips
2007-10-11 16:22 ` Sebastjan Trepca
2007-10-11 16:37 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-11 17:10 ` pete phillips [this message]
2007-10-11 17:55 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-11 18:45 ` pete phillips
2007-10-14 1:01 ` Charles Cave
2007-10-14 2:42 ` Bastien
2007-10-11 19:46 ` Bastien
2007-10-11 21:12 ` Rainer Stengele
2007-10-11 21:19 ` Leo
2007-10-11 23:54 ` Piotr Zielinski
2007-10-12 3:14 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-12 13:50 ` Bastien
2007-10-12 17:09 ` Jason F. McBrayer
2007-10-12 17:03 ` Jason F. McBrayer
2007-10-11 16:53 ` Bastien
2007-10-12 9:21 ` John Wiegley
2007-10-08 20:35 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-09 2:42 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 2:01 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-09 3:35 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-09 3:59 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-09 4:55 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-09 10:42 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 3:37 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 2:58 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-09 10:41 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 14:53 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-11 12:44 ` Bastien
2007-10-11 12:22 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-11 14:03 ` Bastien
2007-10-11 13:21 ` Russell Adams
2007-10-11 13:31 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-12 9:13 ` John Wiegley
2007-10-09 9:44 ` Christian Egli
2007-10-09 10:53 ` Bastien
2007-10-09 15:21 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-10-11 12:44 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27900.1192122650@lap1.smtl.co.uk \
--to=pete@smtl.co.uk \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).