From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: [ANN] Org-babel integrated into Org-mode Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:11:24 -0400 Message-ID: <24591.1278000684@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87wrtp78rg.fsf@gmail.com> <874oglofzs.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87sk4432t8.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkyc4fql.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51239 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUMN5-000781-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:12:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUMMa-0007Vd-FN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:11:49 -0400 Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.13]:53170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUMMa-0007VN-8h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:11:44 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L4V009XXZN0HQ30@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:11:25 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik of "Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:27:31 +0200." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Matt Lundin , Org Mode , Dan Davison Carsten Dominik wrote: > > :-) Actually, in this specific area I had been thinking to > removing or at least deprecating shell and elisp links, > because the Org-babel way is much better and clearer to have > that code in a block, rather than hiding it in the invisible > part of of a link. > Here is an early vote [1] for *not* removing shell and elisp links. Deprecation/documentation/scary warnings is fine with me, but I do use these kinds of links and I'd like to be able to continue using them. Thanks, Nick [1] and if necessary, I can vote often too :-), but I don't know if the vote early/vote often model would work here...