From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Repeating the customization survey? Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:34:09 +0200 Message-ID: <23D61F93-2EE0-4C0C-BA88-2371707078AB@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYyZl-0002sK-TL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:34:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYyZg-0000b0-4B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:34:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22c]:58332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VYyZf-0000al-TT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 09:34:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r16so441649ead.3 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from u019892.science.uva.nl (u019892.science.uva.nl. [146.50.53.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm70235609eev.6.2013.10.23.06.34.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode List Dear all, in 2009, we ran a customization survey, to figure out which variables = are actually used by active Org-mode users. The results can be seen = here: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-configs/org-customization-survey.html I was wondering if it would be useful to repeats this - the results = might be instructive. It should be much easier this time, because we now have a function that = will actually list all changed variables - so we would only have to ask = people to run a simple lisp command and send in the results. Of course, = then a volunteer would have to collect and analyse the output. Last = time Manish and myself did this, and I remember that it was interesting = and fun. Any takers? - Carsten=