From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: non-existent agenda file ~/file.txt. [R]emove from list or [A]bort? Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:43:07 -0400 Message-ID: <23435.1337614987@alphaville> References: <804nr9sqcz.fsf@somewhere.org> <87mx51fywv.fsf@gnu.org> <86bolhr1tb.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWUlQ-00054k-O5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 11:43:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWUlL-00009p-P6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 11:43:16 -0400 Received: from g6t0184.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.61]:45882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWUlL-00009i-K9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 11:43:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FQ=3FFran=3DC3=3DA7ois?= =?us-ascii?Q?=5FPinard=3F=3D?= of "Mon\, 21 May 2012 11\:28\:16 EDT." <86bolhr1tb.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FQ=3FFran=3DC3=3DA7ois=5FPinard=3F=3D?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard wrote: > Bastien writes: >=20 > > "Sebastien Vauban" > > writes: >=20 > >> These last days, I've observed that, whenever creating a new Org file > >> (to be precise, when saving it), I'm asked: > >> > >> non-existent agenda file ~/file.txt. [R]emove from list or [A]bort? > >> > >> I'm then forced to answer `R' for the save to be done. Do you see > >> that behavior as well? >=20 > > Nope. Any help on how to reproduce this? Since which commit do you > > see this? >=20 > I'm not fully sure, but I think I saw this diagnostic already. It was > quite a while ago, and the problem disappeared by upgrading. Could it be > that, by some operational error, Sebastien is using some old Org code? >=20 The message is generated from org-check-agenda-file, so just edebug-defun this function (C-u M-C-x), try the operation and when (if) it stops, get a backtrace with ``d''. Nick PS. I don't see this bahavior at all.