From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Checkbox difficulties Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:32:17 -0400 Message-ID: <23215.1317681137@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <87y5x3jjcl.fsf@gmail.com> <22596.1317621010@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAt9H-0006GS-7E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:46:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAt9F-0001eb-N3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:46:19 -0400 Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:2054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAt9F-0001dh-I0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:46:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Dave Abrahams of "Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:55:39 EDT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dave Abrahams wrote: > > on Mon Oct 03 2011, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > Dave Abrahams wrote: > > > >> Wow, that's awesome... we're *so* close... but how do I get it to > >> automatically mark the item DONE when the last box is checked? > >> > > > > Take a look at > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/42715/focus=42721 > > Works! Oh-so-awesome! Shouldn't these capabilities be built-in and > shipped as first class Org features? > Well, if the function can be made to work completely generally, maybe: as it stands, it is more a proof-of-concept than a complete solution. I added an entry in the FAQ on Worg about this - I figured this is the second time the question has been asked on the list: ergo it's a FAQ ;-) http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#sec-9-7 You might want to read the entry: it includes a slightly revised function but it also includes a couple of caveats that explain why I think it's not a complete solution: Nick