From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Org-Mode Reference Card "bug" Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:41:02 -0500 Message-ID: <23169.1362062462@alphaville> References: <4205.1361992685@alphaville> <86k3ps9645.fsf@somewhere.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57026) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB4fV-0004sh-GX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:41:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB4fT-0002Cx-1h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:41:09 -0500 Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:30384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UB4fS-0002CY-SZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:41:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from "Sebastien Vauban" of "Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:48:10 +0100." <86k3ps9645.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hello Frank and Nick, > > Nick Dokos wrote: > > Frank Mueller wrote: > > > >> Just a remark to the Org-Mode Reference Card > >> (http://orgmode.org/orgcard.pdf). > >> > >> There is a little bug in the spreadsheet description. > >> > >> wrong: > >> sum from 2nd to 3rd hline |:=vsum(@II..@III)| > >> > >> correct: > >> sum from 2nd to 3rd hline |:=vsum(@II..III)| > >> > >> The second at symbol must be deleted for correct working. > > > > Why do you think so? > > I second Nick: your proposition is wrong; it can't work like that. > I heard from Frank privately: there was another error in the formula and he thought he had to get rid of the second @ to make it work. That's not correct: the @III form works fine However, the formula without the @ in front of III *also* works in this case. I don't know whether that's an accident or intended behavior. Nick > Now, maybe you're hit by a feature here: when setting > `org-hide-emphasis-markers' to t, some `@' disappear from the formula (as you > see them, while they're there: enable visible-mode and check it!). > > Is this what happens to you? > > That's a feature... > > Best regards, > Seb > > -- > Sebastien Vauban > >