From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Behavior of Gnus when called from an hyperlink
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:49:44 -0400
Message-ID: <23154.1279399784@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
References: <87r5jrcx9g.fsf@mundaneum.com> <8763138nna.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>
	<87ocev5pn3.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87fx071fsg.fsf@mundaneum.com>
	<23582.1277735944@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<87vd936wiq.fsf@mundaneum.com>
	<87eifr3t52.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87vd8gcu6k.fsf@mundaneum.com>
	<87oce7j26i.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87fwzjfyf8.fsf@mundaneum.com>
	<878w5bkxx7.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87hbjyzicz.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>
	<13292.1279382554@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<87zkxpanh1.fsf@mundaneum.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42336 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OaEKh-0002HP-U6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:50:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1OaEKY-0002aI-DP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:49:56 -0400
Received: from vms173007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.7]:58458)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1OaEKY-0002Zq-AI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:49:54 -0400
Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106])
	by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net
	(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16
	2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L5P00FCRZ6WUS10@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for
	emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:49:45 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: Message from =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?=
	<wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> of "Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:59:38 +0200."
	<87zkxpanh1.fsf@mundaneum.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

=?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> wrote:


> By carefully reading the article just sent by Erik (in another thread) about
> Edebug, becoming aware of the cursor movements under stepping, I now can say
> without error what *really* eats the time.
> 
> I effectively saw every parameter evaluated, every one after the other. Here
> are the results:
> 
> - head :: nnimap-request-head
> - article :: "<871vbxzo6.fsf@mundaneum.com>"
> - (gnus-group-real-name group) :: "INBOX.mc"
> - gnus-command-method :: (nnimap "mc"
>                               (nnimap-address "mail.missioncriticalit.com")
>                               (nnir-search-engine imap))
> - (nth 1 gnus-command-method) :: "mc"
> - (funcall nnimap-request-head "<871vbxzo6.fsf@mundaneum.com>" "INBOX.mc" "=
> mc")
>   results... after 5 mins... in ("INBOX.mc" . 28606)
> 
> So, that's not `nth' that took the time (as previously thought), but the
> `funcall'.
> 
> What does the jury thinks of that?
> 

You've got a few more layers of elisp to go through.

You should edebug-defun the function nnimap-request-article-part in
nnimap.el and keep going. You should also probably investigate what
would happen if you set nnimap-debug to t, after reading its docstring.

Cheers,
Nick