From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: PATCH Bugfix: bulk mark/unmark selects wrong next item when restricted Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:56:13 +0100 Message-ID: <22BE97EC-8C6A-4975-A24C-A4C15370B980@gmail.com> References: <20100102214525.GN6266@cpoint.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRQ0L-0000GQ-7r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:56:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRQ0G-0000FS-Sy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:56:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42408 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRQ0G-0000FP-Ms for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:56:16 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]:47593) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRQ0G-0006zq-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:56:16 -0500 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so17069253ewy.26 for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:56:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100102214525.GN6266@cpoint.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: pholcomb@cpoint.net Cc: Org Mode Hi Paul, On Jan 2, 2010, at 10:45 PM, Paul Holcomb wrote: > > When you are in agenda view and limit the items that are visible, > such as with a tag restriction, marking and unmarking behaves > incorrectly. After the item is marked or unmarked for bulk action, > the point is moved to the next item, regardless of whether the next > item > is visible. The move to the next line is intentional, to make it easy to mark consecutive lines. But you are of course correct that this should not be an invisible line. Fixed, thanks! - Carsten