From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: agenda cycling
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:53:01 -0700
Message-ID: <20524da70908201153k7188cba5p803784cae5075a11@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20524da70908191925u77777cataf9308dd29ed027d@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MeCl3-0004xt-2s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:09 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MeCky-0004kz-KC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:08 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49198 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeCky-0004kf-Eh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:04 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f185.google.com ([209.85.223.185]:33685)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1MeCkx-0002U8-Oj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:04 -0400
Received: by iwn15 with SMTP id 15so55796iwn.14
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20524da70908191925u77777cataf9308dd29ed027d@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

A minor correction.

On 2009-08-19, Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:
>         1) folded
>         2) only the first subtask shows, with no indication
>            that there are any other subtasks
>         3) same as 2

This of course shows body text.  But it is otherwise the same as 2.

>         4) everything except logbook
>         5) everything including logbook

I do believe that there are several interesting possibilities for
cycling in the outline (I have notes on this elsewhere).  But,
whatever cycling there is, I think that it is probably good to have
the same cycling functionality in the agenda and the outline for
consistency, with the possible exception of a one-window state in the
agenda.