From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] call_*() is not working inside #+DATE
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:23:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20160315102358.GU3916@laboissiere.net>
References: <20160307015829.GE11627@laboissiere.net>
	<20160312075704.GI16308@laboissiere.net>
	<20160314164354.GK3916@laboissiere.net>
	<87vb4okfu4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59862)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rafael@laboissiere.net>) id 1afm8y-00057P-64
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:24:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rafael@laboissiere.net>) id 1afm8u-0003RO-6e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:24:04 -0400
Received: from laboissiere.net ([46.101.243.132]:48972)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rafael@laboissiere.net>) id 1afm8t-0003R9-VA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 06:24:00 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87vb4okfu4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

* Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> [2016-03-14 20:41]:

> Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net> writes:
>
>> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net> [2016-03-12 08:57]:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>> I went ahead and committed the patch.
>
> I think this is a bit premature, as we're still discussing how to fix 
> this issue, so this documentation patch is likely to be removed soon.

Hopefully, a solution will be found soon and the documentation will be 
adjusted accordingly.  Notice that, in section "Evaluating code blocks", 
it is written "It is also possible to evaluate named code blocks from 
anywhere […]".

> Moreover, I don't think the problem doesn't appear on maint branch, 
> where you applied your patch. So, at the very least, it should be 
> removed from there.

The problem affects both master and maint, currently.

Rafael Laboissière