From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bingo UV Subject: Re: "atomic knowledge" modeling tool Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:45:49 +0530 Message-ID: <20160203224549.56b2001b@dhcppc15> References: <56ABADA9.2020107@onemodel.org> <87fuxeorpb.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <56AFD8E7.7060001@onemodel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR129-0000Qj-8S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:16:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR126-0001sJ-0K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:16:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241]:36019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR125-0001s7-PG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:15:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id n128so1254520pfn.3 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcppc15 ([122.172.238.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s65sm11212547pfi.12.2016.02.03.09.15.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:15:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56AFD8E7.7060001@onemodel.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:15:03 -0700 luke call wrote: > I'm not org-mode power-user but what I recall from my use years ago > is that I moved away because of the # of keystrokes to do operations,=20 > having to open different files for different topics, and that one > single set of notes couldn't be in more than one place. > =20 Hi, While I am no authority, I will present some information and evidence about why one thing should be only in one place if its purpose is consumption by human beings. It also matches my personal experience - your mileage may vary: https://blog.evernote.com/blog/2015/12/11/evernote-and-the-brain-designing-= creativity-workflows/ Don't let the evernote.com mislead you - the article is not entirely praising of evernote and presents scientific evidence where applicable. =46rom this, I gather that tools promoting explicitly preemptive inter-connection between knowledge pieces like this one-model seems to be are not likely the best uses of one's own brain. Even attempts at exquisite tagging and cross-referencing within emacs org-mode are ill-advised. PS : while the thread is otherwise off-topic, I hope this post was less off-topic. thanks