From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Re: org-review is on melpa Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 22:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2016-09-10T22-10-22@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2016-09-08T12-52-48@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Reply-To: Karl Voit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bioeR-0002cX-90 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:13:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bioeM-00066W-AY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:13:22 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=47279 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bioeM-00065t-4Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:13:18 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bioeA-0005hJ-Gc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 22:13:06 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org * Alan Schmitt wrote: > --=-=-= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Btw, is there a reason that those two lines are not part of the header? With my slrn config, it seems to be the case that the two lines are not taken into account so that your non-ASCII characters are not rendered correctly: > On 2016-09-08 13:02, Karl Voit writes: > >> Hallo Alan, >> >> I don't particularly want to discuss this here because I think >> that I don't need org-review for now. However, I do think that you >> should elaborate on the fact that org-review sounds very similar to >> a simple recurring todo. What are the benefits compared to recurring >> todos? > > One could indeed use recurring todos on tasks like =E2=80=9CReview Project = > A=E2=80=9D > and =E2=80=9CReview Project B=E2=80=9D, but it requires creating such addit= > ional tasks > for each project. Org-review lets you attach another timestamp, > different from the Scheduled or Deadline ones which define when the task > has to be done, to schedule reviews of the task or project within the > task or project. I see. You might want to add this simple explanation at the top of your README.org since it seems to summarize the main feature of your cool tool for Org-mode savvy people. Thanks! -- mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode: > get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs < https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github