3 thanks (was: Re: Bug: Capturing to datetree with inactive timestamp messes up level of heading)

[Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>]

Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> [22. Aug. 2015]:
> Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net> writes:
>> customizing org to add timestamps in datetrees via …
>> (org-datetree-add-timestamp (quote inactive) nil nil "Add an
>> inactive time stamp when create a datetree entry.")… and
>> activating a minimal capture template which captures to a
>> datetree results in:
>>
>> a)
>>
>> * 2015                                  
>> ** 2015-08 August                       
>> *** 2015-08-19 Mittwoch                 
>> [2015-08-19 Mi]                         
>> ** actual entry heading of captured item
>>
>> The heading of the newly captured item is at level 2 instead at
>> level 4.  I consider this to be a bug.  A second capture item to
>> the same day is correctly created at level 4 (and bevor the first
>> captured item which does not belong to the same (or any) day in
>> the datetree).
> 
> Fixed. Thank you.

Thanks.
>> 2)
> This is a different feature. Since it belongs to the captured entry, the
> timestamp should be defined in your capture template (e.g. "%t"
> placeholder) instead.

Thanks.
>> 3)
> See above. You can use "%T".

Thanks again.

Ciao, Gregor
-- 
 -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-