From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: [DEV] Bump Emacs requirement to 24.4? Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:04:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20150819060459.GC29768@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <87io8tfrtk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbctieu3.fsf@gmx.us> <20150806074217.00177cc9@zotac> <87lhdohmii.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnekrfgi.fsf@gmx.us> <874mk15862.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp2povpl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y4hddl2y.fsf@free.fr> <87oai4w69i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRwUk-0001b8-R2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 02:05:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRwUg-0003LV-LQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 02:05:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:37288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZRwUg-0003Kn-Es for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 02:05:02 -0400 Received: by wibhh20 with SMTP id hh20so126554859wib.0 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chitra.no-ip.org (5072840E.static.ziggozakelijk.nl. [80.114.132.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wx9sm29460421wjb.6.2015.08.18.23.05.00 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:05:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oai4w69i.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:01:29AM +0200, Bastien wrote: > > The maint branch continues to be used to work on minor releases, as it > has always been used. > > Instead of reverting changes from the master branch (you clearly don't > want to do that, and I don't either), I suggest we create a new branch > called "org-8-master" for Org 8.4+, and continue to use master for Org > 9.x+ (i.e. "major major releases"). I'm slightly confused as-to why this special org-8-master branch is needed. As far as I understood from Achim's message (2nd paragraph): , that so far maint supports Emacs 23. Although this might have been a coincidence, without a conscious decision. It will continue supporting Emacs 23 until Org 9. Post Org 9, if required, one can choose to start a new maint branch called maint23 for continued Emacs 23 support. Given the above, I do not understand the need for a separate org-8-master branch. Is this a gap in communication, or am I missing something here? Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.