From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: [Bug] ~Verbatim~ in headlines breaks LaTeX Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 00:15:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20150606221551.GI3455@chitra.no-ip.org> References: <87382eg2f4.fsf@posteo.de> <87617a65y5.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87vbfa63ud.fsf@posteo.de> <87wpzqxz9m.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twuu5bzv.fsf@posteo.de> <87r3px5ee3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fri6jl7.fsf@posteo.de> <87a8wdongv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878ubx224x.fsf@posteo.de> <87eglpjnxv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1MNj-0006ls-8g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:16:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1MNe-0007Qz-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:15:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:35020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1MNe-0007Qs-J9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:15:54 -0400 Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so51148263wig.0 for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eglpjnxv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Nick Dokos , Titus von der Malsburg On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:28:12AM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > > > Thee can be handled by protectedtexttt. The obvious questions is of > > course: Wouldn’t it be more consistent to handle all instances of ~code~ > > using protectedtexttt? > > One option would be indeed to remove \verb altogether. Note that it is > also used in inline source blocks. > > However, I assume \verb put less limitations than \texttt on its > contents, so I'd rather keep \verb around. This TeX.SX post discourages the use of \verb. http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/83894/4416 It cites the following FAQ from UK TeX. http://www.TeX.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=verbwithin Maybe it is worth to consider dropping \verb entirely? Hope this helps, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.