From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: bisected
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:08:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20150430120801.GF22882@boo.workgroup>
References: <20150430100450.1112136b@gaia>
	<20150430094957.GC22882@boo.workgroup> <87wq0u53u6.fsf@yahoo.fr>
	<20150430105304.GD22882@boo.workgroup> <87oam56dow.fsf@yahoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36684)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1YnnGj-0001fF-CU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:08:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1YnnGg-0008JT-5l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:08:41 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:55557)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1YnnGf-0008JI-QA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:08:38 -0400
Received: from boo.workgroup ([91.64.233.152]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgZ7h-1ZbixE0QgX-00o210 for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:08:37 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87oam56dow.fsf@yahoo.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Richard <theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr> [30. Apr. 2015]:
> Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net> writes:
> > Sorry, no:
> 
> From Bastien's comment, I wonder : does the following patch helps ?

Yes, but see my other email: The fix in
ea575950d957fcecc74ed6f53c29bb6b77e9fe26 works.

Thanks, grgeor