From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Detlef Steuer <detlef.steuer@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:02:23 +0200
Message-ID: <20150428170223.6940c00f@gaia>
References: <20150427165913.76b92acc@gaia> <874mo1bmhb.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan>
	<20150427195542.6f7ecdff@linux-w3xx.localdomain>
	<87wq0x9zod.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40845)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <detlef.steuer@gmx.de>) id 1Yn71t-0000ws-KB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:02:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <detlef.steuer@gmx.de>) id 1Yn71p-0002Eb-4x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:02:33 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:61454)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <detlef.steuer@gmx.de>) id 1Yn71o-0002E8-Ss
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:02:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87wq0x9zod.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

> 
> >> Set-up (e.g., link abbreviations) is not refreshed after expanding
> >> INCLUDE keywords. I cannot remember why, tho. Maybe for (dubious)
> >> efficiency reasons.
> >
> > If you don't remember, may be it would be possible to try it out?
> > Would love it and as a feature it looks natural for an included
> > file!
> 
> I agree. I added this in 2965f8fb0c048a20b52ba90627e7cca6fe706c93.
> Thank you.
> 

Fantastic! Works like expected now!

Detlef