From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: Export Org checkboxes in ox-html using UTF-8 symbols Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:12:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20140329151214.316e7840@aga-netbook> References: <8738i4t4jc.fsf@gmail.com> <19ffca4dc5566c701621e99313b336cd@mail.rickster.com> <86ppl6a0d8.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTtzm-00011F-JP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:12:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTtzd-0002vL-I1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:12:26 -0400 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:56062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTtzd-0002v9-Bc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:12:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE62442076 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:12:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfF7q30vnNxG for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:12:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from aga-netbook (99-234.echostar.pl [213.156.99.234]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DD0142072 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:12:15 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dnia 2014-03-28, o godz. 10:59:43 Rick Frankel napisa=C5=82(a): > On 2014-03-28 10:01, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > > Rick Frankel wrote: > > BTW, i used "[ ]" for the unchecked box (we use the same for > > checked and trans)... I think i'll change the unchecked box to > > ☐ to match the checked box (same as sachua). > >=20 > > Isn't it error-prone and very misleading to have 3 different states > > in the Org files, and just 2 different in the HTML exports? >=20 > There *are* three different states in the exported file -- the > "transient" mode is for partially completed rollups: >=20 > #+BEGIN_SRC org > ,* rollup > - [-] All done > - [X] one > - [ ] two > #+END_SRC >=20 > Generates (abbreviated and indented): >=20 > #+BEGIN_SRC html >
    >
  • [-] All done >
      >
    • [X] one >
    • >
    • [ ] two >
    • >
    >
  • >
> #+END_SRC Wouldn't it be better to have (maybe in addition) three distinct classes for the
  • elements with checkboxes in various states? This would make styling them with CSS possible. > rick Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University