From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: A minor problem with exporting to html Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20140323122722.5ea940e6@aga-netbook> References: <20140323080845.3e5083ac@aga-netbook> <877g7lnx96.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20140323094459.1208eb2f@aga-netbook> <87ppldl2nj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRgYv-00049b-6d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:27:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRgYq-00041w-Ij for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:27:33 -0400 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:54306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRgYq-00041b-C0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:27:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ECE41D4C for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZJJ7n4YSKHv for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from aga-netbook (99-234.echostar.pl [213.156.99.234]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A94C4206C for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:27:24 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87ppldl2nj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dnia 2014-03-23, o godz. 09:50:24 Bastien napisa=C5=82(a): > Marcin Borkowski writes: >=20 > > But I'd strongly suggest making nil the default value. I find the > > current setting strongly unintuitive (unless one read the manual, > > that is;)), and not really needed (at least for me). If I have the > > export results in a separate buffer or file, why would I need them > > in the kill ring? >=20 > I guess the default value is a left-over from the time when the HTML > export was just a quick hack, targetting users who want to export > small Org buffer and copy that into another (bigger) HTML file. Not > sure. >=20 > > Besides, I often want to do something like this: kill a fragment > > of my buffer (usually some option, but not necessarily), export the > > file, decide that I preferred the previous version, and yank it > > back. Obviously, I can use undo - but what about yanking it in > > another place, for instance? >=20 > I don't know any other place than the kill-ring, but setting > `org-export-copy-to-kill-ring' to nil should solve the problem, > already, no? Well, yes - it did it for me, at least. But it required setting the option. And I suspect that what the majority of users might need/expect is having this option set to nil - that was what I meant. BTW, I also think that Org is awesome. Thanks a lot! --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University