From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [RFC] Creole-style / Support for **emphasis**__within__**a word** Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 01:06:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20140323010635.2d2323fb@aga-netbook> References: <87zjl6ktu2.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwgimiqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87txaqmhzd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh1umeso.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRVw7-0007AT-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:06:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRVw1-0000Ci-Tu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:06:47 -0400 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:40707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRVw1-0000CQ-Mj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:06:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304D141D47 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 01:06:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZDi2Zthyk47w for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 01:06:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from aga-netbook (99-234.echostar.pl [213.156.99.234]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10CF84206C for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 01:06:37 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87eh1umeso.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dnia 2014-03-22, o godz. 16:30:31 Nicolas Goaziou napisa=C5=82(a): > > Also, there is no "backward-compatibility squad", only users who > > care about what they like. >=20 > That is what they want us to believe! :) Ninja'd! Re: topic: one idea that is maybe not very Org-ish, but seems reasonable: Org already uses LaTeX syntax for sub/superscripts, and accepts LaTeX snippets etc. Why not allow \textbf{something} parallel to *something*? Would it break something? When using the LaTeX exporter, currently it seems (from very few simple experiments), that \textbf{whatever} copies "whatever" verbatim to the file (I tried LaTeX and HTML exporters). Of course, one problem would be nesting - regexen won't help in this. But it could be restricted to just letters or something (yes, I know, very inelegant hack - but let's brainstorm a little, maybe someone could come up with a better idea). > Regards, Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University