From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Org mode issue tracker
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:04:03 +0200
Message-ID: <20130925080403.GS12411@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
References: <A021C644-02F5-4BF9-8858-E7A44B971540@gmail.com>
	<86ioxp2vbb.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34643)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1VOk54-0006BW-Jn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 04:04:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1VOk4w-0008Gy-0n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 04:04:18 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]:49123)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1VOk4v-0008Gb-Pc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 04:04:09 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b45so3058136eek.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86ioxp2vbb.fsf@somewhere.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:51:20AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> 
> The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the
> `org' package is already known to them), if that's possible. Anyway, having the
> bugs in an Org file seems natural too!

I think this is a great idea.  A combination of an Org file (either
public or private) and the Emacs bug tracker with Org package tags
should be able to handle our needs.

I see only one potential problem, is there an easy way to subscribe to
only a specific package tag on the Emacs bug tracker?  I imagine most
contributors following Org bugs will not be interested in other Emacs
bugs.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.