From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: bug#14605: Problem with export an .org file to .pdf does not open pdf file Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:36:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20130919063652.GA443@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <20130917194250.GA16911@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <20130917202134.GB16911@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <20130917212557.GC16911@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87eh8m4hx6.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <20130918121429.GA2905@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <7618A639-D354-436C-A7D4-A0030F9C9663@gmail.com> <8761txig54.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMXrR-0007ap-NF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:37:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMXrG-0002AN-C2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:37:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]:63867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMXrG-0002AH-4b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 02:36:58 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b45so3995226eek.1 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:24:51AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 19.9.2013, at 06:34, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > Carsten Dominik writes: > > > >> On 18.9.2013, at 14:14, Suvayu Ali wrote: > >> ... > >>> I think that is expected. The bug is in the desktop specific open > >>> commands. Since you use none, generic open is used. That is simply a > >>> shell function, and does the right thing. > >> > >> Is there a generic open command in Linux? Why don't we use this instead? > >> > > > > Not really. There is a shell function called open_generic inside of > > xdg-open. I believe that's what Suvayu was referring to. But there is > > no clean way of calling it, short of pulling it out of the xdg-open > > script into a new script: as a general solution, that's hopeless. > > All right. Too bad. Thank you. Nick said it accurately. It is part of the xdg-open script. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.