From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug] #+call does not respect :colnames argument
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:10:28 -0400
Message-ID: <20130729011028.GB72906@BigDog.local>
References: <1e44d3b3697f439e425399908547d946@mail.rickster.com>
	<87vc3xgqa5.fsf@gmail.com> <20130726205233.GA72349@BigDog.local>
	<87zjt8g6vj.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52628)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1V3byp-0004UJ-Cy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:10:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1V3byi-0007Ym-T4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:10:31 -0400
Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=45969 helo=mail.rickster.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1V3byi-0007Yh-QP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:10:24 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zjt8g6vj.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:54:08PM -0600, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:
> The later is not valid call line syntax, see [1] for a full description
> of the call line syntax.  In effect what happens in the latter case, is
> you set :colnames to "yes]".

Oh, ok. I just saw other people using that syntax on the  list so wondered.

> Thanks for you help debugging this.

my pleasure. ust wish i understood the code well enought to provide
patches instead :{.

rick