From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Updating Worg: call to Worg authors Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:25:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20130424072512.GB28898@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUu4w-00033g-Hi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:25:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUu4r-0000Wd-C7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:25:22 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]:65393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUu4r-0000WF-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:25:17 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t11so1375211wey.20 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com (ip82-139-118-35.lijbrandt.net. [82.139.118.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t14sm31368143wib.0.2013.04.24.00.25.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:57:20PM -0400, Jay Kerns wrote: [...chomp...chomp...chomp...] > CALL TO WORG AUTHORS: > > - Please checkout the worg-new-exporter branch and update those files > which are yours. > - Please mark DONE or INPROGRESS files in worgmap.org. > - If you cannot or are not able to update your files, please say so on > the mailing list so other volunteers can update them instead. > Alternatively, you can mark your files as ABANDONED in worgmap.org. I'm not clear about the workflow. Why is there a need for a separate branch? I thought there was already a consensus to document the new exporter under exporters/ox-.org or exporters//*.org depending on whether a single file is sufficient or a directory is needed for examples and other stuff. How does this new plan go with the above, do I make changes in this new branch, or do I keep working on master? Thanks, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.