From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: GFDL Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:06:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20130319200612.00365b93@aga-netbook> References: <878v5wwr96.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <6D1B3E63-A3F0-447E-A1F4-12F8B3156DB9@gmail.com> <513BD73C.3050704@gmail.com> <58FF2382-A0A8-47E2-BEA0-8E88542C6638@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI2jC-0005yi-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:01:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI2j6-0001Yo-4d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:01:46 -0400 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:57663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI1rY-00012x-Dz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:06:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D2E6AF68 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:06:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPKZO6U25XE4 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:06:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from aga-netbook (jedenzero5-dziewiecosiem.echostar.pl [213.156.105.98]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 783DA6AF61 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:06:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <58FF2382-A0A8-47E2-BEA0-8E88542C6638@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dnia 2013-03-19, o godz. 07:44:51 Carsten Dominik napisa=C5=82(a): > Hi Alan, >=20 > thanks for chiming in. As Achim quoted, the GFLD says that the > license should be in the document, but that makes the GFDL almost > unfit for anything below a book. >=20 > I have asked RMS about this, and he says that the license should be > present in printed versions of the document. I find it very hard to > believe that this must be the case. It bothers me mostly for the > guide, where I did spend a lot of time to make it compact, and now > something like one fifth of it is license text. We may actually > consider to re-release the guide under a different license. Just a n00b's (and IANAL's) 2cents here: what about including the GFDL in, say 5pt font? Yes, it is awful, but at least does not take up dozens of pages... > Will try to find a solution here. >=20 > - Carsten Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University