From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:05:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20130318170532.2a44b789@aga-netbook> References: <6449B53A-997D-411D-8E13-AAFAE6D81397@gmail.com> <87mwu0n371.fsf@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHcZG-0008Dd-1m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:05:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHcZ8-0005on-34 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:05:45 -0400 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:50716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHcZ7-0005nO-SO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:05:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA8B69BF9 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:05:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUxEIr87309B for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:05:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from aga-netbook (jedenzero5-dziewiecosiem.echostar.pl [213.156.105.98]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E80BA69BEB for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:05:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87mwu0n371.fsf@riseup.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dnia 2013-03-18, o godz. 15:21:54 wgreenhouse@riseup.net (W. Greenhouse) napisa=C5=82(a): > Perhaps a compromise could be reached on variables such as > `org-emphasis-alist' and others possibly slated for the defconst > treatment: instead of doing that, let's consider keeping them > customizable but include the default values in the Org format > specification. Org users who are never using Org outside of Emacs > will never see a problem using custom emphasis marks inside Emacs, > unless Org drops the feature. For those who know that they want to > use their Org files with some external parser, we could have an > `org-rfc-check' function that warns about non-standard values of > things like org-emphasis-alist and offers to revert them to the > defaults (which would be the same as the values in the spec). >=20 > What do you think? Is this a crazy scheme? Just Another N00b's 2cents: what about moving such things from core to contrib? Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University