From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was:
 Editing folded headlines and ellipses)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:29:45 +0100
Message-ID: <20130312152945.54401817@aga-netbook>
References: <20130310003718.GA6483@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
	<87k3pfbntp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<20130310095715.GB6483@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
	<513de46c.c455b40a.047b.48b5@mx.google.com>
	<87boao4wig.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<513f315e.c462b40a.36eb.2dd8@mx.google.com>
	<87li9s3dha.fsf_-_@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56215)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1UFQDX-0007fq-LW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:30:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1UFQDT-0006rM-Hp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:30:15 -0400
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([150.254.78.50]:43652)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1UFQDT-0006qp-CG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:30:11 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9542C48B35
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:29:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id n2IhFgGjiPwD for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>;
	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:29:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aga-netbook (jedenzero5-dziewiecosiem.echostar.pl
	[213.156.105.98])
	by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 551C048B18
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:29:48 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <87li9s3dha.fsf_-_@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Dnia 2013-03-12, o godz. 15:21:53
Bastien <bzg@altern.org> napisa=C5=82(a):

> Hi Darlan,
>=20
> Mhh... yes, I see.
>=20
> I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits'
> but I'd like to know what other contributors think.
>=20
> So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be?

I'm not (yet?) a contributor, just a simpleton user, but for me: nil is
a bad idea here.

> Thanks,

Best,

--=20
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Adam Mickiewicz University