From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [new exporter] #+TOC in beamer export
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:35:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20130305223542.GR7544@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
References: <87hakq2dqb.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <877glltt4x.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87lia17btl.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41413)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1UD0Sb-0004h3-Me
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:35:50 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1UD0Sa-0005Zj-K8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:35:49 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]:50023)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1UD0Sa-0005Zf-Df
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:35:48 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r5so6981989wey.32
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lia17btl.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:53:42PM +0100, Andreas Leha wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
> > Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
> >
> >> from a recent thread I learned about #+TOC (there's always something new
> >> to learn about org mode).
> >>
> >> I'd like to use it in a beamer document.  Here I find it hard to use
> >> because it introduces its own frame.
> >>
> >> My question basically is:  How is this supposed to be used in a beamer
> >> doc?
> >> (And would it not be easier if it did not introduce its own frame?)
> >
> > It seems useful to keep frame around TOC generated from toc:t option.
> > But we could remove it from TOC generated from #+TOC keywords.
> >
> 
> Thanks for taking this further.  Indeed, for the toc:t triggered TOC the
> frame is absolutely useful.

I'm not sure what a \tableofcontents outside a frame would look like.
Can someone show an example?

I also had another thought; sometimes for long presentations, I use
something like this:

  \AtBeginSubsection[]{
    \ifthenelse{
      \(\value{section}=1\)\AND\(\value{subsection}=1\)
    }{}
    {
      \begin{frame}<beamer>
        \frametitle{Outline}
        \tableofcontents[currentsubsection]
      \end{frame}
    }
  }

At the moment I put it in as one long LaTeX_HEADER line.  But would it
be possible to leverage #+TOC: into having a similar effect?  It might
then provide a greater degree of control where you want the toc frame to
appear.

Cheers,

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.