From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-element
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:35:24 +0100
Message-ID: <20130222133524.GB8541@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
References: <loom.20130222T122955-421@post.gmane.org>
	<20130222131437.GA8541@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
	<87vc9kjxae.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46267)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1U8smk-0003pQ-9T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:35:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1U8smf-0006SL-Cx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:35:34 -0500
Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:51125)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1U8smf-0006S6-6V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:35:29 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a12so284495eaa.41
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87vc9kjxae.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:25:13PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:38:16AM +0000, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >> 
> >> How is one supposed to write (longer) equations out on multiple lines (leaving
> >> the operators behind on the previous line obviously works, but is ugly)?
> >
> > I use LaTeX blocks.  So your example would translate to:
> >
> > #+begin_latex
> >   \begin{equation}
> >     r = a
> >     + b
> >     - c
> >   \end{equation}
> > #+begin_latex
> 
> This is a bit different from what the OP is asking for. A LaTeX block
> will only be exported by a latex (or derived) back-end. On the other
> hand, \[1+1\] may be exported by any back-end (for example using mathjax
> in html).
> 

Ah!  I did not realise that \[..\] was also interpreted by mathjax.
Thanks for pointing it out.

> Anyway, the equivalent would be a LaTeX environment:
> 
>   \begin{equation*}
>   r = a
>   + b
>   - c
>   \end{equation*}

Typo on my part. :-p

Cheers,

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.