From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Bug: with option hidestars to be hidden stars are on white
 backround on block terminal [7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-882-gf47a71 @
 /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)]
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:45:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20121229004558.GA12518@boo.workgroup>
References: <87d2xu8fjq.fsf@boo.workgroup>
 <kbkasl$he6$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50801)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1TokZl-0004wO-Gc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:47:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1TokZi-000856-Pe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:46:57 -0500
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:56660)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1TokZi-00084y-Gm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:46:54 -0500
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.4]) by mrigmx.server.lan
	(mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MNfPA-1ThZpf1nQI-007H8x for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:46:53 +0100
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <kbkasl$he6$1@ger.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Achim, Bastien, org-developers,
* Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Nexgo.DE> [28. Dec. 2012]:
> Am 28.12.2012 14:36, schrieb Gregor Zattler:
>>I use option `hidestars' and Emacs/org-mode on a terminal with
>>black background.  Since a few days the superflous stars are not
>>hidden any more but shown on a white background.  This makes them
>>stand out very much.
> 
> I don't see how this change is related since it changes the
> foreground, not the background.  What do the following things return
> if you eval them in the org buffer (with M-: since they are not
> interactive):

I don't know if it's essential to this tests if the commit in
question is applied or not so I do this two times: 

first line is for 
Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-890-g9cf680 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)
(--> patch reverted; stars are hidden)
second line is for
Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-877-ge6d8ed @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)
(--> with Bastiens patch, stars with white background)
> (face-background 'default nil 'default)
"unspecified-bg"
"unspecified-bg"
> (face-foreground 'default nil 'default)
"unspecified-fg"
"unspecified-fg"
> (face-background 'org-hide nil 'default)
"unspecified-bg"
"unspecified-bg"
> (face-foreground 'org-hide nil 'default)
"black"
"unspecified-bg" (yes: "-bg")

This is on a customised rxvt-unicode with (among others) the
following command line options:  
-tn rxvt-unicode-256color -fg white -bg black
It's the same on uncustomised xterm.

Ciao, Gregor
-- 
 -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-