From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vikas Rawal <vikaslists@agrarianresearch.org>
Subject: Re: The statement on what is orgmode.
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:26:40 +0900
Message-ID: <20121206122640.GA14867@panahar>
References: <20121205222817.GA1243@panahar>
 <87zk1rim19.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60392)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vikaslists@agrarianresearch.org>) id 1TgaXQ-0002uf-5D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 07:26:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vikaslists@agrarianresearch.org>) id 1TgaXP-0001kc-1U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 07:26:48 -0500
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:35355)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vikaslists@agrarianresearch.org>) id 1TgaXO-0001kW-Rp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 07:26:46 -0500
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id xa7so4406672pbc.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 04:26:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zk1rim19.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

> 
> Why not just type out what the page should say?  That is in the spirit
> of collaborative way of using things.
> 
> Your mail sounds more like a complaint, but with a polite tone.

Oops. I was not complaining. I am sorry if my mail gave that
impression. I raised an issue. Or, what I thought was an issue. In my
first mail, I did not suggest a formulation because I was not sure
what I wanted it to be. Also, I thought it was better to first see if
others thought there was an issue in what I was saying.

In my second mail, I have made a suggestion. I am not sure if that is
the best solution. May be somebody can come up with a better solution.
But I have suggested what my little mind could come up with.

Vikas