From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: nbsp and /italics/
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:35:15 +0200
Message-ID: <20121018113515.GB16407@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
References: <m11uh1yrhm.fsf@tsdye.com>
 <87k3uqcgyn.fsf@pank.iue.private>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41999)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1TOoNw-0005Ht-DH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:35:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1TOoNs-0006n7-92
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:35:32 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:39165)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1TOoNs-0006n3-29
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:35:28 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so918361wgb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k3uqcgyn.fsf@pank.iue.private>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:14:24PM +0200, Rasmus wrote:
> Can anyone think of a clever regexp that recognizes the above pattern?
> I tried, "\\.[ ]\{1\}" but it didn't work.  And without the \{1\} it's
> too strong. . .
> 

I believe you need to group the whole regexp for the {1} to work.  Try
something like this: "\\(\\. \\)\\{1\\}"

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.