From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: can't find org-version? Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:55:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20120904115559.GB2267@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> References: <878vcrkbuu.fsf@jnanam.net> <1346657034.96590.YahooMailNeo@web29806.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <5044C335.4090004@grierwhite.com> <1346757283.96924.YahooMailNeo@web29806.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8rjk-0003Hb-7Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:56:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8rjj-0003XR-2f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:56:08 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:40037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8rji-0003X5-Ry for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:56:06 -0400 Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2633486bkc.0 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 04:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1346757283.96924.YahooMailNeo@web29806.mail.ird.yahoo.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Giovanni Ridolfi Cc: "orgmode@grierwhite.com" , Achim Gratz , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , "slade@jnanam.net" Hi Giovanni, On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:14:43PM +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > > > org-toodledo effectively does: > >   (require 'org) > > Then uses the variable org-version.  > > This has worked just fine for a few years, but > > ... but since few months the place where org-version is defined has changed > from org.el > to org-version.el > that is generated during compilation IIRC (!)   If I'm wrong  Achim Gratz will correct me. > I think the change you mention above is transparent to both the end-user and thrid-party packages. It should be immaterial here. Of course Achim should correct me if I'm wrong. :) > > It seems wrong to me that hacking org-toodledo is the appropriate solution.  > I disagree. > > Would you please try to add (require 'org-install) instead of (require > 'org)  and see if org-toodledo works? > The (require 'org-install) bit is supposed to be user code, specific for each installation; it is highly dependent on the load-path. IMO, the problem here is the OP[1] has a mixed installation and neither org or org-toodledo needs any fix. There are many discussions about mixed installations in the archive and Worg. It would be worthwhile if the OP went through this one in particular: . Hope this helps, Cheers, PS: I wish there was a canonical way to diagnose mixed installs. :-| Footnotes: [1] I forgot who it was, sorry. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.