From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viktor Rosenfeld Subject: Re: Drawers within inline tasks Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:12:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20120420091245.GA33349@kenny.local> References: <20120127224653.GA1365@kenny.fritz.box> <87bopnzwpc.fsf@gnu.org> <20120128160247.GA64669@kenny.fritz.box> <87pqe3wgy8.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SL9tg-0001di-BC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:13:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SL9te-0007Ku-GS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:12:55 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:49093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SL9te-0007Kj-6o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:12:54 -0400 Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so8801195bkw.0 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pqe3wgy8.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, when I open the parent task of an inline task drawers are not folded anymore. Not sure when this regression occured. Cheers, Viktor Bastien wrote: > Hi Viktor, > > Viktor Rosenfeld writes: > > > Thanks for the quick patch, but there's a small problem. The drawer is > > collapsed if the inline task is opened, but not if the parent task is > > opened. > > > > Example: > > > > * Parent Task > > *************** Inline Task > > :PROPERTIES: > > :Effort: 0:15 > > :END: > > *************** END > > > > Pressing TAB on Inline Task keeps the property drawer collapsed. > > Pressing TAB on Parent Task opens it. > > Fixed, thanks. > > I first didn't take care of this because it seemed logical to > show all the content of an inline task here: the purpose of the > inline task is to stay out of the hierarchical structure, such > a task is *not* a subtree... so the real content of "Parent task" > is all the text below -- whether it contains inline tasks or not. > > But I can see that it's not visually consistent with the habit > of keeping stuff folded, so let's go that way. > > Thanks for reporting this, > > -- > Bastien >